<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Are you a god?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.enderra.com/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog</link>
	<description>Art, Writing and Worldbuilding Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:12:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, i kinda see what you meant though, now that i searched around a bit- any waste could be burned alongside wood in a stove, i was thinking of somthing like a wood gas powered engine for power as well (2 birds 1 bomb) 
But not sure how wrappers etc would change gas... look up &quot;gassifier&quot; or &quot;wood gas engine&quot; if you want to see more... it was on The Colony tv  show.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, i kinda see what you meant though, now that i searched around a bit- any waste could be burned alongside wood in a stove, i was thinking of somthing like a wood gas powered engine for power as well (2 birds 1 bomb) 
But not sure how wrappers etc would change gas&#8230; look up &#8220;gassifier&#8221; or &#8220;wood gas engine&#8221; if you want to see more&#8230; it was on The Colony tv  show.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What trash? Its not like people can go shopping during the time spent.... items in the shelter will decrease in size as they are consumed.  And solar will still work, or an excersize bike generator....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What trash? Its not like people can go shopping during the time spent&#8230;. items in the shelter will decrease in size as they are consumed.  And solar will still work, or an excersize bike generator&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by steven</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;one point i wanted to mention was trash. what could you do with it? i don&#039;t expect too much.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and no one has really thought of a good way to provide power.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one point i wanted to mention was trash. what could you do with it? i don&#8217;t expect too much.</p>

<p>and no one has really thought of a good way to provide power.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by jimmy23</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1359</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1359</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the answer to climate comfort is geothermal heat and cooling. its a heavy investment but CHEAP to run and keep running. plus, the need for combustion air is minimal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the 90 degree entry is spot on. radiation cant turn a corner easily. plus, worst case, its easy to defend if people try to force their way in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;water storage can be put into a gray tank for reuse. it would be super keen if you could dig a well inside or next to your shelter. again, cheap to maintain and run. plus, the water will be as clean as any youll find provided the water table is deep enough. it would be easy to test as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the answer to climate comfort is geothermal heat and cooling. its a heavy investment but CHEAP to run and keep running. plus, the need for combustion air is minimal.</p>

<p>the 90 degree entry is spot on. radiation cant turn a corner easily. plus, worst case, its easy to defend if people try to force their way in.</p>

<p>water storage can be put into a gray tank for reuse. it would be super keen if you could dig a well inside or next to your shelter. again, cheap to maintain and run. plus, the water will be as clean as any youll find provided the water table is deep enough. it would be easy to test as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by Roark</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nils;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I found your blog by accident by googling NaNoWriMo.  Funny you&#039;re thinking about something I&#039;ve been goofing with for years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FWIW, CT has it about right. :)  Read &quot;Nuclear War Survival Skills&quot; by Cresson Kearney.  Just about everything you need to separate the facts from the fiction is there.  If you need a copy, email me. It&#039;s an eBook in PDF format. Exhaustive, well-informed reading.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A few other thoughts:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1).  Use geometry shielding (90 degree angles) to shield your door.  Done properly, each 90 degree bend drops the incoming exposure by a factor of 10x. (Ie, one 90 deg bend takes a 300 rad/hr field down to 30 rad/hr). It also tends to break-up the shockwave if you do it right, and makes your door less vulnerable to blast debris and distant small-arms fire.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2).  Berm the entire structure.  3 feet of dirt all around and use of 12 inch thick concrete walls give a 1400:1 reduction in absorbed dose for your occupants.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3).  Consider using ICF&#039;s (insulated concrete forms... Google it, Reward Wall Systems, Inc) for your wall structures.  You can assemble these like Legos, add-in the code-required rebar, and fill them with concrete.  The US Army tested a structure made with these against a simulated airburst nuclear device of 150 kt yield at a slant range of 3000 meters.  It cracked slightly but did not yield. The simulated occupants survived nicely.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;4).  Consider the effects of the EMP pulse in your planning.  The super-efficient flourescent lamps and LEDS currently in vogue are poor survivors in an EMP event.  Add-in some of the basic tried-and-true Edison bulbs as a fall-back.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;5).  Consider moving the generator room.  Decouple it from the main slab and give it it&#039;s own isolated space.  Two reasons: a). Noise and vibration.  b). Fire resistance.  Understand a diesel rig won&#039;t be hurt by indirect blast pressure (just keep the debris from hitting it and keep the overpressure pulse under 20 psi) and it won&#039;t care a bit about ultra-high radiation fields.  So this critter can (and should) go into a bermed vault with a concrete cover displaced a few inches around the perimeter for ventilation. You can access this gen-pen from the main living area via a short tunnel with a blast door.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;6).  If you plan on having self-generated power, you&#039;ll need not only abundant fuel (diesel is ideal)... but a redundant / servicable power system. Design for accessibility and sustainability. Stock spare parts. Know how to trouble-shoot and repair everything quickly. Understand that any &quot;modern&quot; genny will have a brushless head and internal excition. Ditch this complexity for a &quot;cheap&quot; chinese head using a Z-winding feedback-excitation scheme.  (You can fix it in less than 10 minutes once you understand how they work, and parts are &lt;strong&gt;cheap&lt;/strong&gt; and universally available).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;7).  Ventilation is the Achilles Heel of any shelter.  Where I live, you couldn&#039;t survive the heat/humidity of such a shelter for more than a few hours.  Air movement, or air conditioning, is a requirement.  Your current design doesn&#039;t allow much, if any, cross-flow.  You might want to work on this aspect.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to seeing what you submitted to NaNoWriMo!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nils;</p>

<p>I found your blog by accident by googling NaNoWriMo.  Funny you&#8217;re thinking about something I&#8217;ve been goofing with for years.</p>

<p>FWIW, CT has it about right. :)  Read &#8220;Nuclear War Survival Skills&#8221; by Cresson Kearney.  Just about everything you need to separate the facts from the fiction is there.  If you need a copy, email me. It&#8217;s an eBook in PDF format. Exhaustive, well-informed reading.</p>

<p>A few other thoughts:</p>

<p>1).  Use geometry shielding (90 degree angles) to shield your door.  Done properly, each 90 degree bend drops the incoming exposure by a factor of 10x. (Ie, one 90 deg bend takes a 300 rad/hr field down to 30 rad/hr). It also tends to break-up the shockwave if you do it right, and makes your door less vulnerable to blast debris and distant small-arms fire.</p>

<p>2).  Berm the entire structure.  3 feet of dirt all around and use of 12 inch thick concrete walls give a 1400:1 reduction in absorbed dose for your occupants.</p>

<p>3).  Consider using ICF&#8217;s (insulated concrete forms&#8230; Google it, Reward Wall Systems, Inc) for your wall structures.  You can assemble these like Legos, add-in the code-required rebar, and fill them with concrete.  The US Army tested a structure made with these against a simulated airburst nuclear device of 150 kt yield at a slant range of 3000 meters.  It cracked slightly but did not yield. The simulated occupants survived nicely.</p>

<p>4).  Consider the effects of the EMP pulse in your planning.  The super-efficient flourescent lamps and LEDS currently in vogue are poor survivors in an EMP event.  Add-in some of the basic tried-and-true Edison bulbs as a fall-back.</p>

<p>5).  Consider moving the generator room.  Decouple it from the main slab and give it it&#8217;s own isolated space.  Two reasons: a). Noise and vibration.  b). Fire resistance.  Understand a diesel rig won&#8217;t be hurt by indirect blast pressure (just keep the debris from hitting it and keep the overpressure pulse under 20 psi) and it won&#8217;t care a bit about ultra-high radiation fields.  So this critter can (and should) go into a bermed vault with a concrete cover displaced a few inches around the perimeter for ventilation. You can access this gen-pen from the main living area via a short tunnel with a blast door.</p>

<p>6).  If you plan on having self-generated power, you&#8217;ll need not only abundant fuel (diesel is ideal)&#8230; but a redundant / servicable power system. Design for accessibility and sustainability. Stock spare parts. Know how to trouble-shoot and repair everything quickly. Understand that any &#8220;modern&#8221; genny will have a brushless head and internal excition. Ditch this complexity for a &#8220;cheap&#8221; chinese head using a Z-winding feedback-excitation scheme.  (You can fix it in less than 10 minutes once you understand how they work, and parts are <strong>cheap</strong> and universally available).</p>

<p>7).  Ventilation is the Achilles Heel of any shelter.  Where I live, you couldn&#8217;t survive the heat/humidity of such a shelter for more than a few hours.  Air movement, or air conditioning, is a requirement.  Your current design doesn&#8217;t allow much, if any, cross-flow.  You might want to work on this aspect.</p>

<p>Looking forward to seeing what you submitted to NaNoWriMo!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What I&#8217;m up to by Deadeas</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/what-im-up-to/comment-page-1#comment-1346</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadeas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1960#comment-1346</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good to hear that someone is trying to continue what SaD was doing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear that someone is trying to continue what SaD was doing.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by ct</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>ct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1) Air is not radioactive, you don&#039;t need to pressurize your shelter.
2) Fallout is heavier than air as it is the debris picked up by the air rushing back into &quot;Ground Zero&quot; after the initial blast.
3)Putting curves in your weak spots, the air shafts and entrances, will act like grease trap do and trap the fallout.
4)Putting curves in your weak spots also adds to your must important safty precaution, Shielding&quot;.
5)&quot;Shielding&quot;, the more mass between you and fallout, 
which as the name implies &quot;falls&quot; &quot;out&quot; of the sky and lannds on surfaces just like all forms of dust, the safer you are.
6)After the first 7hrs 90% of the radiation from a conventional bomb fades.  BUT if you save your $ by not pressurizing and spending it on water, food, first aid, guns and ammo, AND SHIELDING and spare air filters you&#039;ll live alot happier.
7)300 rems in a hr is considered survivable with rapid intensive medical intervention. Yeah, like you&#039;re going to find any after an explosion! But in a well supplied well SHIELDED shelter that drops to nothing and after 7hrs. outside decays to 30 on it&#039;s own, after 14 days while you cann&#039;t farm inside the 10mi blast radius for ten years you can contiue.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Air is not radioactive, you don&#8217;t need to pressurize your shelter.
2) Fallout is heavier than air as it is the debris picked up by the air rushing back into &#8220;Ground Zero&#8221; after the initial blast.
3)Putting curves in your weak spots, the air shafts and entrances, will act like grease trap do and trap the fallout.
4)Putting curves in your weak spots also adds to your must important safty precaution, Shielding&#8221;.
5)&#8221;Shielding&#8221;, the more mass between you and fallout, 
which as the name implies &#8220;falls&#8221; &#8220;out&#8221; of the sky and lannds on surfaces just like all forms of dust, the safer you are.
6)After the first 7hrs 90% of the radiation from a conventional bomb fades.  BUT if you save your $ by not pressurizing and spending it on water, food, first aid, guns and ammo, AND SHIELDING and spare air filters you&#8217;ll live alot happier.
7)300 rems in a hr is considered survivable with rapid intensive medical intervention. Yeah, like you&#8217;re going to find any after an explosion! But in a well supplied well SHIELDED shelter that drops to nothing and after 7hrs. outside decays to 30 on it&#8217;s own, after 14 days while you cann&#8217;t farm inside the 10mi blast radius for ten years you can contiue.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by steven</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;just do some research, you might need more then a couple feet. there are some anti-radiation pills out there that are cheap. you might want to invest in some, it couldn&#039;t hurt. not sure if you have the money for them but there are also radiation suits, they are at least a grand each but it&#039;s better to over react then under react.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;so what is your take on the water problem and the security issue?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;well my idea for the renewable energy was to raise them from inside the bunker or outside after the blast is over with. maybe wearing the radiation suits i suggested.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just do some research, you might need more then a couple feet. there are some anti-radiation pills out there that are cheap. you might want to invest in some, it couldn&#8217;t hurt. not sure if you have the money for them but there are also radiation suits, they are at least a grand each but it&#8217;s better to over react then under react.</p>

<p>so what is your take on the water problem and the security issue?</p>

<p>well my idea for the renewable energy was to raise them from inside the bunker or outside after the blast is over with. maybe wearing the radiation suits i suggested.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by Nils</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Supplementing the generator with renewables does make sense, if you have a lot fo space. Solar panels are getting more efficient, so especially in sunny areas (say California) they are probably a good idea; but they are outside and thus not protected well. You also can&#039;t really hide them, if you want.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This design is mostly a fallout shelter, and less of a bomb shelter. That is, it&#039;s not expected to survive in close proximity to the blast, of course that&#039;d be a bonus but it&#039;s a HUGE engineering challenge. Alpha and beta radiation are blocked very easily, Gamma is the problem that you need a lot of shielding for. 50ft underground is quite expensive, I think as long as your bunker is covered with a few feet of earth it should be fine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The fallout from a nuclear blast is actually surprisingly short-lived. It should be reasonably safe to go outside after some weeks, say 1-2 months at most.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supplementing the generator with renewables does make sense, if you have a lot fo space. Solar panels are getting more efficient, so especially in sunny areas (say California) they are probably a good idea; but they are outside and thus not protected well. You also can&#8217;t really hide them, if you want.</p>

<p>This design is mostly a fallout shelter, and less of a bomb shelter. That is, it&#8217;s not expected to survive in close proximity to the blast, of course that&#8217;d be a bonus but it&#8217;s a HUGE engineering challenge. Alpha and beta radiation are blocked very easily, Gamma is the problem that you need a lot of shielding for. 50ft underground is quite expensive, I think as long as your bunker is covered with a few feet of earth it should be fine.</p>

<p>The fallout from a nuclear blast is actually surprisingly short-lived. It should be reasonably safe to go outside after some weeks, say 1-2 months at most.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NaNoWriMo 2009 &#8220;Won&#8221; by Are you a god? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What I&#8217;m up to</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/nanowrimo-2009-won/comment-page-1#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you a god? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What I&#8217;m up to</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1956#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] my new real-life job keeping me busy, NaNoWriMo ate up a lot of free time in November. That&#8217;s done and over, and with the holidays coming up I should have a good amount of time to write and [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my new real-life job keeping me busy, NaNoWriMo ate up a lot of free time in November. That&#8217;s done and over, and with the holidays coming up I should have a good amount of time to write and [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by steven</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;also i would think about renewable energy maybe some way to raise solar panels or maybe a windmill or maybe a hybrid of both. you will be using the energy all the time and i expect the generator to go down. not the mention the gas you will need to store to keep the generator going. also the noise would start to drive you nuts. in that confined of a place the noise would just bounce around.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also i would think about renewable energy maybe some way to raise solar panels or maybe a windmill or maybe a hybrid of both. you will be using the energy all the time and i expect the generator to go down. not the mention the gas you will need to store to keep the generator going. also the noise would start to drive you nuts. in that confined of a place the noise would just bounce around.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by steven</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;well there is one huge miscalculation you made in your design. the water, you would NEED an internal source of water, the design i once made consisted of two tanks similar to the ones used to store gasoline. an external source of water would be very contaminated even underground sources.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;plus, if you are thinking of making it suitable for 18+ people then i would add more storage room. or if you want it for less then i would remove one of the living quarters to add more room for storage. you have to think, people are going to be living down there for 3-4 months at LEAST. so, to have enough storage for all of them would be nessisary. not including storage for after you leave the area. so basically, you would need tools for rebuilding your homes, ways to farm (if that is even possible) guns and ammo (and lots of them) plus, maybe a second bunker to store a couple vehicles and lots of gas. plus, once you leave the bunker you can&#039;t expect to run into a stockpile of food and water. so that would be needed to plan into also.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;remember, if people are outside they will be trying to get in to save their own lives. so camouflage! (or if everyone in your neighborhood knows that you built a bunker that will not be necessary) so then you will need ways to &quot;remove&quot; the people that are trying to get in. i.e. gun ports, mines, and whatever you might think of.  because, sooner or later they will get inside, and they might just kill you all. maybe a safe door (like the kind that is in banks, even though they are expensive) maybe you could engineer one on your own. maybe you could make a few bars of steel that could be places into the floor through angled holes that could be wedged into the door or the door frame. that would be helpful also. plus i would think about making the ramp very narrow. so that no one could drive a semi or a forklift or some vehicle into the door.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i see alot of you are worried about radiation getting in. honestly earth is the best defense against radiation. as long as you are at least 50 feet underground then i think you will be ok.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the ramp is really the only way you can bring things easily into the bunker. and still be safe from the first blast.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;while i am mentioning these things you might just be thinking $. but, honestly a couple 10,000 dollars isn&#039;t that much when you are thinking about your family and friend&#039;s lives.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well there is one huge miscalculation you made in your design. the water, you would NEED an internal source of water, the design i once made consisted of two tanks similar to the ones used to store gasoline. an external source of water would be very contaminated even underground sources.</p>

<p>plus, if you are thinking of making it suitable for 18+ people then i would add more storage room. or if you want it for less then i would remove one of the living quarters to add more room for storage. you have to think, people are going to be living down there for 3-4 months at LEAST. so, to have enough storage for all of them would be nessisary. not including storage for after you leave the area. so basically, you would need tools for rebuilding your homes, ways to farm (if that is even possible) guns and ammo (and lots of them) plus, maybe a second bunker to store a couple vehicles and lots of gas. plus, once you leave the bunker you can&#8217;t expect to run into a stockpile of food and water. so that would be needed to plan into also.</p>

<p>remember, if people are outside they will be trying to get in to save their own lives. so camouflage! (or if everyone in your neighborhood knows that you built a bunker that will not be necessary) so then you will need ways to &#8220;remove&#8221; the people that are trying to get in. i.e. gun ports, mines, and whatever you might think of.  because, sooner or later they will get inside, and they might just kill you all. maybe a safe door (like the kind that is in banks, even though they are expensive) maybe you could engineer one on your own. maybe you could make a few bars of steel that could be places into the floor through angled holes that could be wedged into the door or the door frame. that would be helpful also. plus i would think about making the ramp very narrow. so that no one could drive a semi or a forklift or some vehicle into the door.</p>

<p>i see alot of you are worried about radiation getting in. honestly earth is the best defense against radiation. as long as you are at least 50 feet underground then i think you will be ok.</p>

<p>the ramp is really the only way you can bring things easily into the bunker. and still be safe from the first blast.</p>

<p>while i am mentioning these things you might just be thinking $. but, honestly a couple 10,000 dollars isn&#8217;t that much when you are thinking about your family and friend&#8217;s lives.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NaNoWriMo 2008, Day #25 &#8211; We have a Winner by Are you a god? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NaNoWriMo 2009 &#8220;Won&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/nanowrimo-2008-day-25-we-have-a-winner/comment-page-1#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you a god? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NaNoWriMo 2009 &#8220;Won&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1700#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] occupied, I also did not have any furniture at home, having just moved into a new apartment. Like last year, I encountered mental resistance to the project after some time, and just like last year I asked [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] occupied, I also did not have any furniture at home, having just moved into a new apartment. Like last year, I encountered mental resistance to the project after some time, and just like last year I asked [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NaNoWriMo 2008 Post-Mortem by Are you a god? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NaNoWriMo 2009 &#8220;Won&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/nanowrimo-2008-post-mortem/comment-page-1#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you a god? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NaNoWriMo 2009 &#8220;Won&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1572#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] made all the difference is that I followed one of the lessons learned from last year: This time I created an outline ahead of time. Some adjustments were necessary, as I [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made all the difference is that I followed one of the lessons learned from last year: This time I created an outline ahead of time. Some adjustments were necessary, as I [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thraeton and Enderra Map WIPs by Nils</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/thraeton-and-enderra-map-wips/comment-page-1#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1897#comment-1295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s really not that special, I am afraid. I&#039;m still learning myself. It&#039;s mostly inkscape with a whole lot of layers. I&#039;ll eventually write some nice tutorials, once I have something worth-while to say on the subject. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really not that special, I am afraid. I&#8217;m still learning myself. It&#8217;s mostly inkscape with a whole lot of layers. I&#8217;ll eventually write some nice tutorials, once I have something worth-while to say on the subject. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by Nils</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the angled ramp idea is mostly a blast protection and not quite as much a radiation protection issue. If it faces towards the likely targets, an angled design makes a lot of sense because the blast wave would indeed get funneled down towards the shelter&#039;s door (and thus the door needs to withstand more pressure) and the earth does act as additional shielding against the initial gamma ray blast. If it&#039;s mostly a fallout shelter, the angle wouldn&#039;t make much of a difference - alpha/beta radiation shouldn&#039;t penetrate any kind of decent wall or door anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks, all, for the suggestions, by the way - keep &#039;em coming!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the angled ramp idea is mostly a blast protection and not quite as much a radiation protection issue. If it faces towards the likely targets, an angled design makes a lot of sense because the blast wave would indeed get funneled down towards the shelter&#8217;s door (and thus the door needs to withstand more pressure) and the earth does act as additional shielding against the initial gamma ray blast. If it&#8217;s mostly a fallout shelter, the angle wouldn&#8217;t make much of a difference &#8211; alpha/beta radiation shouldn&#8217;t penetrate any kind of decent wall or door anyway.</p>

<p>Thanks, all, for the suggestions, by the way &#8211; keep &#8216;em coming!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by medicineman</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>medicineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One thing you overlooked is that radiation does not stop when it hits a door, airlock, or wall.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your entryway needs to be at a right angle to the structure itself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The design above would funnel the radiation into your shelter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing you overlooked is that radiation does not stop when it hits a door, airlock, or wall.</p>

<p>Your entryway needs to be at a right angle to the structure itself.</p>

<p>The design above would funnel the radiation into your shelter.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by Jack Woodward</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Woodward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;this is a grate idea...
with terrorists looking for russian nukes locked away in old barns and nort koria looking offencive this is brilliant.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i mean locked up with you family is fine if your a loner and some extremly rash.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;why not save your friends aswell.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ok sorry about that little intro. for a fallout shelter you need a polt of land where you and all your mates can get to within two to three minuets adverage warning time for a missile. you can build the bunker within a week if threats rise quickly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;list of what i would have:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;room up to 36 people to sleep
kitchen using hydrogen gas (easy to produce)
food for two year max including plants for extra food production
enough water for two years plus five stage water filtration
toilets 
showers
hydrogen powered genorator
sofa&#039;s
dinning area
wrighting desks
air filtration system
radio/music player
computers (setup network)
games room
swimming pool
heating, coal, oil , gas, hydrogen
gym
board games
books
games consoles
valubles metals (don&#039;t worry you will not be the only survivers so store cashs as something valuble paper money if worth nothing especiale after an attack)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;becuase not everyone you love and care for can fit in because of the buget...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;make sure there are more shelters within one hundered meters.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;after attack&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;send out radio signals after two days.
from the air lock send up flares after two weeks every two hours (possible automatic rig)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;after six months turn to ground above every two days to eliminate radiation plus flus out with water. one year later plant crops trees ect...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;by year two radiation should be gone and resonable food production should be avalible&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,</p>

<p>this is a grate idea&#8230;
with terrorists looking for russian nukes locked away in old barns and nort koria looking offencive this is brilliant.</p>

<p>i mean locked up with you family is fine if your a loner and some extremly rash.</p>

<p>why not save your friends aswell.</p>

<p>ok sorry about that little intro. for a fallout shelter you need a polt of land where you and all your mates can get to within two to three minuets adverage warning time for a missile. you can build the bunker within a week if threats rise quickly.</p>

<p>list of what i would have:</p>

<p>room up to 36 people to sleep
kitchen using hydrogen gas (easy to produce)
food for two year max including plants for extra food production
enough water for two years plus five stage water filtration
toilets 
showers
hydrogen powered genorator
sofa&#8217;s
dinning area
wrighting desks
air filtration system
radio/music player
computers (setup network)
games room
swimming pool
heating, coal, oil , gas, hydrogen
gym
board games
books
games consoles
valubles metals (don&#8217;t worry you will not be the only survivers so store cashs as something valuble paper money if worth nothing especiale after an attack)</p>

<p>becuase not everyone you love and care for can fit in because of the buget&#8230;</p>

<p>make sure there are more shelters within one hundered meters.</p>

<p>after attack&gt;</p>

<p>send out radio signals after two days.
from the air lock send up flares after two weeks every two hours (possible automatic rig)</p>

<p>after six months turn to ground above every two days to eliminate radiation plus flus out with water. one year later plant crops trees ect&#8230;</p>

<p>by year two radiation should be gone and resonable food production should be avalible</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thraeton and Enderra Map WIPs by Wellington Grey</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/thraeton-and-enderra-map-wips/comment-page-1#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellington Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1897#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Alex, your drawings are great.  Would you consider posting how you&#039;ve done them?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Alex, your drawings are great.  Would you consider posting how you&#8217;ve done them?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Design: Torture in World of Warcraft by wow man</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/bad-design-torture-in-world-of-warcraft/comment-page-1#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>wow man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1782#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article thanks! Since a meaningful decision, whatever that may look like, is not possible, I feel that the designers should have taken the opportunity to educate the players with the quest. Or just leave it out entirely.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article thanks! Since a meaningful decision, whatever that may look like, is not possible, I feel that the designers should have taken the opportunity to educate the players with the quest. Or just leave it out entirely.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Design: Torture in World of Warcraft by Charlotte</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/bad-design-torture-in-world-of-warcraft/comment-page-1#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1782#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The relevant point is that, at a time when the use of torture is under current political discussion, our media and entertainment industry have a responsibility to treat the topic of torture ethically and responsibly.  If the media portrays torture as an effective and ethical means of interrogation and obtaining information, it becomes part of our culture&#039;s belief system and affects real people&#039;s decisions and eventually real laws.  Torture is neither a valid nor ethical means of interrogation and is not an effective means of obtaining accurate information (as expressed by many experienced interrogators http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/etn/primetime/interrogators.asp).  The point is that WOW, which is played by millions of young people, should not be communicating a pro-torture message.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relevant point is that, at a time when the use of torture is under current political discussion, our media and entertainment industry have a responsibility to treat the topic of torture ethically and responsibly.  If the media portrays torture as an effective and ethical means of interrogation and obtaining information, it becomes part of our culture&#8217;s belief system and affects real people&#8217;s decisions and eventually real laws.  Torture is neither a valid nor ethical means of interrogation and is not an effective means of obtaining accurate information (as expressed by many experienced interrogators <a href="http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/etn/primetime/interrogators.asp)" rel="nofollow">http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/etn/primetime/interrogators.asp)</a>.  The point is that WOW, which is played by millions of young people, should not be communicating a pro-torture message.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by survivalist</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>survivalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The creativity and insight you put into your floor plan is interesting but highly impractical.  Firstly, this is meant as a short term survival solution, so although comfort is important for peoples sanity, it is unnecessary in practice.  The bathroom could be integrated with the shower room and all the bunk rooms should be combined.  Of course, this is all academic, even with the best floor plan, you need to concentrate on the reinforcement of the roof.  This has to be sturdy enough not only to support the weight of the roof but also the ground cover on top of it.  Realistically, there is no way for a civilian to harden the shelter against the blast from a detonation of a nuclear weapon without a huge bank account and attracting some attention, but as a fallout shelter its fairly easy, just make sure you&#039;re outside any potential target blast zones!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The creativity and insight you put into your floor plan is interesting but highly impractical.  Firstly, this is meant as a short term survival solution, so although comfort is important for peoples sanity, it is unnecessary in practice.  The bathroom could be integrated with the shower room and all the bunk rooms should be combined.  Of course, this is all academic, even with the best floor plan, you need to concentrate on the reinforcement of the roof.  This has to be sturdy enough not only to support the weight of the roof but also the ground cover on top of it.  Realistically, there is no way for a civilian to harden the shelter against the blast from a detonation of a nuclear weapon without a huge bank account and attracting some attention, but as a fallout shelter its fairly easy, just make sure you&#8217;re outside any potential target blast zones!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by d'Anconia</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>d'Anconia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;to Chicago:  Good idea, but it would be smart to have those solar panels in a military grade Faraday enclosure (large metal box, hermetically sealed w/copper gaskets) that is not grounded.  Also, you have to contend with inverters, etc.  Better idea to have a larger battery bank, and a diesel battery charger.  Also, a smaller battery bank to run a few lights for the hour or two period when the bank needs charging.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, as far as emergency rations go, don&#039;t choose MRE&#039;s. Instead, pick the longest possible duration to stay (about 3 months), and buy those vaccuum sealed mayday bars (in 1200, and 3600 calorie bars).  At 1200 calories per day, everyone would have enough energy to exercise (calisthenics, etc), and the rations come in (I believe) 400 calorie blocks, leaving the option of rationing for longer periods.
Another thing...  You may want to build a shelter out of reinforced concrete, but look into the reinforcing materials they are beginning to use in San Francisco, to reinforce older brick buildings.  It goes on like wallpaper, but actually allows brick structures to be more &quot;flexible&quot;, and &quot;bend&quot; with the force of a blast, or earthquake, without ruining its structural integrity.  I used to have the link, but my old computer harddrive died.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to Chicago:  Good idea, but it would be smart to have those solar panels in a military grade Faraday enclosure (large metal box, hermetically sealed w/copper gaskets) that is not grounded.  Also, you have to contend with inverters, etc.  Better idea to have a larger battery bank, and a diesel battery charger.  Also, a smaller battery bank to run a few lights for the hour or two period when the bank needs charging.</p>

<p>Also, as far as emergency rations go, don&#8217;t choose MRE&#8217;s. Instead, pick the longest possible duration to stay (about 3 months), and buy those vaccuum sealed mayday bars (in 1200, and 3600 calorie bars).  At 1200 calories per day, everyone would have enough energy to exercise (calisthenics, etc), and the rations come in (I believe) 400 calorie blocks, leaving the option of rationing for longer periods.
Another thing&#8230;  You may want to build a shelter out of reinforced concrete, but look into the reinforcing materials they are beginning to use in San Francisco, to reinforce older brick buildings.  It goes on like wallpaper, but actually allows brick structures to be more &#8220;flexible&#8221;, and &#8220;bend&#8221; with the force of a blast, or earthquake, without ruining its structural integrity.  I used to have the link, but my old computer harddrive died.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 20:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;doug is right that any particles that enter from outside would be contaminated. it is illogical to build a bomb shelter that is meant to shield from radiation if you are going to let it in through every crack. Also the air filtration system would most likely be the most expensive system in the shelter. again, you can not pull in radio active air. it would have to basically filter out all but pure O2. (difficult). Also unless your planing on taking close hit. (im guessing your not because even with 20ft of concrete the shelter would be toast) i would think about investing in a small battery bank. 4 -6 deep cycle batteries. (golf cart batteries) and 2 medium sized solar panels and an inverter+charge controller. solar mounted out side would supply energy without fuel usage  and with no movable parts that could break.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doug is right that any particles that enter from outside would be contaminated. it is illogical to build a bomb shelter that is meant to shield from radiation if you are going to let it in through every crack. Also the air filtration system would most likely be the most expensive system in the shelter. again, you can not pull in radio active air. it would have to basically filter out all but pure O2. (difficult). Also unless your planing on taking close hit. (im guessing your not because even with 20ft of concrete the shelter would be toast) i would think about investing in a small battery bank. 4 -6 deep cycle batteries. (golf cart batteries) and 2 medium sized solar panels and an inverter+charge controller. solar mounted out side would supply energy without fuel usage  and with no movable parts that could break.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing a Nuclear Fallout Shelter by d'Anconia</title>
		<link>http://www.enderra.com/blog/article/designing-a-nuclear-fallout-shelter/comment-page-1#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>d'Anconia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enderra.com/blog/?p=1251#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You would definitely want over/under pressure protection valves.  Many so-called bomb shelters that are available actually double as NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) shelters.  Along with hermetic seals at all doors, as well as filters for all air, overpressuring a shelter is the easiest way to keep contaminants out of the shelter.
Also, your design, while very well thought out, is illogical.  With so many corners, blast pressure differentials will have a much higher chance of destroying your shelter.  I would suggest having the generator room accessible through the air lock, to ease re fueling, maintenance, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would definitely want over/under pressure protection valves.  Many so-called bomb shelters that are available actually double as NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) shelters.  Along with hermetic seals at all doors, as well as filters for all air, overpressuring a shelter is the easiest way to keep contaminants out of the shelter.
Also, your design, while very well thought out, is illogical.  With so many corners, blast pressure differentials will have a much higher chance of destroying your shelter.  I would suggest having the generator room accessible through the air lock, to ease re fueling, maintenance, etc.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
